Candidate ranking

Rank candidates to focus review, not to replace judgment.

CVault compares candidates to role criteria and surfaces must-haves, gaps, evidence, and reviewer state.

How does ranking assist review without pretending to automate hiring?

Review scorecard
Role criteria
Must-haveBackend APIs92%
WeightedPostgreSQL84%
GapHealthcare domainreview

Ranking inputs

Role criteria

Must-haves and nice-to-haves are treated as review criteria, not universal truth.

Evidence support

Scores are useful only when reviewers can inspect what supported them.

Reviewer control

Shortlist movement remains a human workflow with notes and status attached.

Decision areaCVaultGeneric parsing
Score meaningPrioritization for review.Automated pass/fail implication.
Missing criteriaShown as gaps for reviewer confirmation.Hidden in a final score.
Decision ownerHiring team stays accountable.The model appears to decide.

Reviewed rollout

Rank one live role and inspect the evidence.

A pilot makes ranking quality visible before you depend on it.

Review access options